romero frangulyan
301/301 reviewed (100%) · Complete review11 own real attempts · 6 opponent real attempts — full analytics render in the main tabs.
1 unresolved attribution/validity verdicts — a floor on missingness.
← Fighters
Ask the AnalystAsk the analyst → verdict evidence on file
VERIFIEDfull tape · lead-left
Valodya Frangulyan
7
verified strikes (swept)
1
fights on file
1
verified fights
0
machine fights
01
The tape in one line
the strongest measured read on file — receipts attached
absorbs
2landed strikes absorbed
Frangulyan absorbed 2 landed strikes across 1 fight — 2 punches.
n = 2 landed strikes (one opponent per bout)
single bout — observed vs Anthony Romero only
punch2 punches absorbed
Watch the Film Study▾
vs Anthony Romero1:081:09
greyed: no playable video registered
standup-scoped, in-round hand-log events (single annotator; ~11–15% estimated strike undercount — every level is a floor)
received = the OPPONENT's landed strikes in this bout (single-opponent context); annotator-judged landed only
engine provenance ▸
source handlog · 2 events
strike mix
insufficient data
7 of 25needs 18 more
only 7 in-round standup strikes on file — 25 needed
unlock: more labeled fights unlock this
pre-registered gate: n ≥ 25 for shares/conditionals
side mix
insufficient data
7 of 25needs 18 more
only 7 standup in-round events (< 25)
unlock: more labeled fights unlock this
pre-registered gate: n ≥ 25 for shares/conditionals
strike types
insufficient data
7 of 25needs 18 more
only 7 classified strikes on file — 25 needed
unlock: more labeled fights unlock this
pre-registered gate: n ≥ 25 for shares/conditionals
output by round
7.5strikes per minute, round by round
Frangulyan threw 7.5 strikes a minute in round 1 — the only round on file.
n = 7 strikes
single bout — observed vs Anthony Romero only
round 17.5/min (7 strikes)
Watch the Film Study▾
vs Anthony Romero0:290:300:450:561:01
greyed: no playable video registered
standup-scoped, in-round hand-log events (single annotator; ~11–15% estimated strike undercount — every level is a floor)
per-round counts sit on a Poisson floor of roughly ±18–25% — read trends, not single-round precision
engine provenance ▸
source handlog · 7 events
what lands on him
2landed strikes absorbed
Frangulyan absorbed 2 landed strikes across 1 fight — 2 punches.
n = 2 landed strikes (one opponent per bout)
single bout — observed vs Anthony Romero only
punch2 punches absorbed
Watch the Film Study▾
vs Anthony Romero1:081:09
greyed: no playable video registered
standup-scoped, in-round hand-log events (single annotator; ~11–15% estimated strike undercount — every level is a floor)
received = the OPPONENT's landed strikes in this bout (single-opponent context); annotator-judged landed only
engine provenance ▸
source handlog · 2 events
sweep-verified
Computed from a human sweep (no hand-log). Sides are physical left / right — stance unavailable, not lead / rear; a per-fight stance asset would unlock lead/rear.
What follows what
each row shows what he throws next after that strike — deeper red means it happens more often; click a row for the film. rows without enough tape stay visible with their reasons — an honest “not enough data” beats a confident guess
Sequences
consecutive strikes with every gap inside the fixed window — ranked by frequency
combinations
insufficient data
2 of 25needs 23 more
only 2 2-strike sequences on file — 25 needed
unlock: pooling more labeled fights unlocks this
combinations
insufficient data
0 of 25needs 25 more
only 0 3-strike sequences on file — 25 needed
unlock: pooling more labeled fights unlocks this
When he gets hit
how often Valodya Frangulyan fires back within 2 seconds of eating a strike. The “vs chance” number compares that to what his own pace would produce at random — so it measures deliberate answering, not just busyness. This is about his offense, not how open he is to being hit.
when he gets hit
insufficient data
5 of 25needs 20 more
only 5 opponent strikes to respond to — 25 needed
unlock: more labeled fights unlock this
pre-registered gate: n ≥ 25 for shares/conditionals
⟶ Measured reads
the strongest conditional signals on file — receipts attached, nothing editorial
The strike that lands on him most: the cross — 1 of the 2 he absorbed.n = 2 landed strikes
What lands on him
the openings an opponent actually found — annotator-judged landed strikes absorbed
2landed strikes absorbed
cross×1
jab×1
single-opponent context per bout — a hole an opponent found, not a population rate
the gate
pre-registered gate: n ≥ 25 for shares/conditionals. Rows below the gate stay visible with their reasons — an honest "not enough tape" beats a confident guess.
limitedDefense telemetry is early: the signal is real and eyeball-confirmed, but capture coverage — not the metric — is the blocker. More verified tape unlocks it.
defensive tell — guard recovery
insufficient data
0 of 25needs 25 more
guard telemetry coverage too thin under the frozen validity rules for this fighter
unlock: a defense-telemetry upgrade is pre-registered — these cells re-grade automatically after the next data pass
pre-registered gate: n ≥ 25 for shares/conditionals
fight volume
7human-verified strikes (swept)
7 human-verified strikes (swept) in this fight — 4 punches, 3 kicks.
n = 7 strikes
punch4 punch
kick3 kick
Watch the Film Study▾
vs Anthony Romero0:290:300:450:561:01
greyed: no playable video registered
standup-scoped, in-round hand-log events (single annotator; ~11–15% estimated strike undercount — every level is a floor)
no round/segment scoping available for this fight — raw fight-window counts only
engine provenance ▸
source handlogsweep 7
Verified verdict profile
Operator verdict-ledger evidence, kept separate from temporal tendencies. Complete reviews may support totals and gated rates; partial reviews remain labeled samples; reviews below the coverage floor expose only their withholding reason.
Complete-review pooled totals
11 own real attempts across romero frangulyan · 6 opponent real attempts. Partial and withheld fights are excluded from these totals and every rate.
Own clean-landed rate: only 11 pooled complete-fight real attempts — 25 needed · Opponent clean-landed-on-him rate: only 6 pooled complete-fight opponent real attempts — 25 needed
Strike mixes, combinations, and conditionals for these complete-review fights are computed once, by the cell engine, and rendered in the Overview, Striking, and Fight IQ tabs — this panel repeats none of them.
The three frozen verdict gates
- Per-fight mix shares require n ≥ 25 reviewed real attempts; below it, counts only.
- Complete-fight pooled mix shares and own rates require n ≥ 25 real attempts.
- Defense clean-absorb rates require a complete review and n ≥ 25 opponent real attempts.
- Partial reviews are non-random samples: counts and eligible sample mixes are not fight totals or accuracy.
- Physical side means left/right, not lead/rear stance. Jab/cross for swept strikes is stance-INFERRED from pose: a windowed ankle-vote at the strike instant when decisive (94.3% vs hand-log truth), else the fight-level lead; strikes where both abstain stay "straight" rather than guess.
- A single reviewer produced these verdicts; unresolved attribution/validity verdicts are a floor on missingness.
Coverage & provenance
packpack-v3
vocabv1.1
data through2026-08-10
regression gatePASS
vs Anthony Romero
301/301 (100%)verifiedcomplete assertion review: 301/301 (100%); temporal stream admitted; assertion review complete: 301/301 (100.0%); 1 unresolved — a floor on missingness
Not measurable from broadcast
the single-feed footage can’t support these — they are not a locked upgrade, they simply aren’t recoverable. Saying so is the product.
not recoverable
Landed / grazed / missed
outcome carries ~no machine signal at this capture and is unreliable even by eye from a single broadcast feed
not recoverable
Fine punch subtype (jab / cross / hook)
capped by 72% annotator self-agreement and the single-feed capture wall
not recoverable
Clinch & ground interior
the corpus is standup-scoped — a single broadcast feed can't resolve grappling exchanges
not recoverable
Feint intent
intent-without-contact is not recoverable from broadcast video
Known limits
- single-annotator ground truth; measured undercount ~8.8% on the deepest-swept fight — global estimate 11–15%; every count is a floor, not an exaggeration
- tendency numbers are standup-scoped and in-round; clinch/ground exchanges are not measured
- stance (lead/rear) is a per-fight constant from a pose asset; a mid-fight stance switch would mislabel lead/rear symmetrically
- per-round counts sit on a Poisson floor of roughly ±18–25%; product language is trends and conditionals, never single-round precision
Every fight on this fighter's file — the event, the result, and how deep the verified data goes.
vs Anthony Romeroverified countshelp verify this fight →
Want more of their fights processed? Start a pack or request a fight.