VERIFIEDcounts only

Brian Ortega

“T-City”

logged strikes

fights on file

verified fights

machine fights

No tendency-grade fight yet — this fighter's corpus is counts-only. The Tale of the Tape tab shows exactly what exists and what would unlock more.

limitedDefense telemetry is early: the signal is real and eyeball-confirmed, but capture coverage — not the metric — is the blocker. More verified tape unlocks it.

defensive tell — guard recovery

insufficient data

0 of 25needs 25 more

guard telemetry coverage too thin under the frozen validity rules for this fighter

unlock: a defense-telemetry upgrade is pre-registered — these cells re-grade automatically after the next data pass

pre-registered gate: n ≥ 25 for shares/conditionals

fight volume

50hand-logged strikes

50 hand-logged strikes in this fight — 47 punches, 3 kicks.

n = 50 strikes

punch47 punch

kick3 kick

Watch the Film Study▾

vs Holloway0:080:100:100:160:22

greyed: no playable video registered · times index the registered upload

standup-scoped, in-round hand-log events (single annotator; ~11–15% estimated strike undercount — every level is a floor)

no round/segment scoping available for this fight — raw fight-window counts only

engine provenance ▸

source handlog · 50 events

Verified verdict profile

Operator verdict-ledger evidence, kept separate from temporal tendencies. Complete reviews may support totals and gated rates; partial reviews remain labeled samples; reviews below the coverage floor expose only their withholding reason.

no verdict data

No verified verdict-ledger data yet. This profile does not show invented strike totals, rates, or zero placeholders.

The three frozen verdict gates

Per-fight mix shares require n ≥ 25 reviewed real attempts; below it, counts only.
Complete-fight pooled mix shares and own rates require n ≥ 25 real attempts.
Defense clean-absorb rates require a complete review and n ≥ 25 opponent real attempts.

Partial reviews are non-random samples: counts and eligible sample mixes are not fight totals or accuracy.
Physical side means left/right, not lead/rear stance. Jab/cross for swept strikes is stance-INFERRED from pose: a windowed ankle-vote at the strike instant when decisive (94.3% vs hand-log truth), else the fight-level lead; strikes where both abstain stay "straight" rather than guess.
A single reviewer produced these verdicts; unresolved attribution/validity verdicts are a floor on missingness.

Coverage & provenance

packpack-v3

vocabv1.1

data through2026-08-10

regression gatePASS

vs Holloway

round boundaries not yet annotated for this fight; strikes.csv has CRLF line endings

clip-sampled — mix and landed rates skew toward action

verified

Not measurable from broadcast

the single-feed footage can’t support these — they are not a locked upgrade, they simply aren’t recoverable. Saying so is the product.

not recoverable

Landed / grazed / missed

outcome carries ~no machine signal at this capture and is unreliable even by eye from a single broadcast feed

not recoverable

Fine punch subtype (jab / cross / hook)

capped by 72% annotator self-agreement and the single-feed capture wall

not recoverable

Clinch & ground interior

the corpus is standup-scoped — a single broadcast feed can't resolve grappling exchanges

not recoverable

Feint intent

intent-without-contact is not recoverable from broadcast video

Known limits

single-annotator ground truth; measured undercount ~8.8% on the deepest-swept fight — global estimate 11–15%; every count is a floor, not an exaggeration
tendency numbers are standup-scoped and in-round; clinch/ground exchanges are not measured
stance (lead/rear) is a per-fight constant from a pose asset; a mid-fight stance switch would mislabel lead/rear symmetrically
per-round counts sit on a Poisson floor of roughly ±18–25%; product language is trends and conditionals, never single-round precision